Startup Non Compete Agreement

In states that generally impose non-competition prohibitions, another factor likely to influence the application of a non-compete clause is the reason for the end of the worker`s employment. If the employee stops or has been fired for misconduct or something more than a general poor performance, it is more likely that a court will impose non-competition obligations. However, if the employee has been dismissed due to restructuring or even a general poor performance, courts will be less likely to enforce non-competition obligations or not enforce non-competition obligations in some states. Finally, ambiguous (at least partial) notions are considered by the court to be inappropriate and totally unenforceable. For example, in the case of Shafron v. KRG Insurance Brokers, the term Metropolitan City of Vancouver was considered ambiguous because there is no legally defined city. Although this is a fairly easy idea to understand, the term has not been specifically defined to allow the court to tell, in a given case, whether a place was within or outside the geographic area described in the agreement. If you think your non-compete agreement will hinder your attempts to start a business, advising a lawyer with experience in labour law in your state may be a good idea. Your lawyer can tell you whether these arguments are valid in your state and can offer other arguments.

He or she can also help you invalidate the contract or negotiate new terms with which you can live. Keep in mind that a consultation costs much less than defending a lawsuit. Suppose I spent years creating a family restaurant with all my special recipes, business contacts, processes, etc., and I invite you to work with me. I`m going to teach you everything about business; All my secrets. But to make sure that I can trust that you don`t take everything I`ve taught you and you don`t use it elsewhere, I ask you to agree not to compete with us for a year if you leave. A non-competition clause providing for a short-term restriction of employment (i.e. less than two years), a limited priority of employment (i.e. only competing employers and similar jobs) and a limited geographical scope, could further severely restrict the free movement of workers. Employees may be reluctant to work for a company that limits their future freedom of movement.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.