In a paper published on March 21, 2019 (the “Response”), the Clean Energy Association of BC (CEBC) responded to a critical report in February that bc Hydro had purchased “too much energy, paid too much for the energy it purchased- and these actions were taken on instruction from the government.” Zapped also criticizes inflation protection mechanisms in EPAs with IPPs which, in some cases, provide the applicable PIP with a comprehensive consumer price index (CPI). This includes the 60-year EPAs for the Forest Kerr, Volcano and McLymont Creek hydroelectric projects, for which Zapped explains that the estimated impact of inflation risk over the next 20 years could result in an additional cost of $1 billion and an increased inflation risk on the rest of the EPA`s terms, which is about $7 billion. “As a result, we have renewed contracts with IPPs at prices below what they would have paid under the original contracts and have generally recovered most of their capital cost through their original contractual terms. In addition, in most cases, the price of electricity generated from IPPs is higher than current market rates. David Austin, an electricity market lawyer at Stirling LLP, said the answer was an emphatic “yes.” Electrification of the LNG and natural gas industry should take place much earlier to ensure that electricity supply is available prior to the construction of new facilities and other infrastructure. It is unlikely that companies will electrify their facilities without ensuring that this electricity supply will be available. They should use natural gas to power most of their new facilities. A renewal strategy that will moderate the future financial impact of power purchase contracts, with a single renewal offer on projects producing intermittent energy, at the real value of the energy produced on the market The government ordered BC Hydro to purchase 8,500 GWh of solid energy that it did not need and the distribution company acquired 8,075 GWh of solid energy. which represents the estimated cost of $16.2 billion over 20 years, “the estimated period during which BC Hydro is unlikely to require the government to order it to purchase.” The report reports an estimated $808 million per year, which affected this excess energy on BC Hydro taxpayers, or 4,000 $US per residential tariff over 20 years.
- No categories